Technology can be a powerful ally in conservation, but it’s not a silver bullet. Too often, tools like drones, GPS apps or satellite imagery are introduced as standalone solutions, disconnected from those who have stewarded these ecosystems for generations.

What’s missing isn’t innovation. It’s inclusion. Local and Indigenous communities bring centuries of knowledge, experience and care to the lands they protect. Even the most sophisticated technology can fall short when this wisdom is overlooked.

The spread of geospatial tools has opened exciting new possibilities: communities can now track deforestation, monitor biodiversity and respond to threats in real time. But there are barriers: limited internet, high costs and steep learning curves make adoption uneven, especially in rural and Indigenous areas.

And there are deeper concerns:

• Satellite data might detect forest loss, but it can’t recognize the subtle shifts in plant behavior or animal migration patterns that locals notice immediately.
• Without safeguards and clear ownership agreements, sensitive information can be misused, undermining trust and sovereignty.

In short, no matter how advanced the tool, it cannot replace lived experience. Conservation is not just a technical task. It’s relational, cultural and deeply human.

Technology means little without trust

The success of any conservation project depends on how well it is integrated into community life. When new tools are introduced without respect for traditional ways of knowing, they can cause confusion or even resistance. But something powerful happens when local knowledge is treated as equal to digital insight.

Take the Communal Forest of the 48 Cantones in Totonicapan, home to the largest remaining conifer forest in Guatemala and the highest concentration of the endangered Guatemalan fir tree (Abies guatemalensis), locally known as pinabete. Monitoring such remote terrain is challenging. That’s why we at EcoLogic Development Fund partnered with park staff to introduce drones and deforestation alert systems, not to replace anyone’s expertise but to help rangers work more safely and effectively.

Jonatan, who supported the training, remembers the early hesitation: “They’ve spent years walking these forests, knowing every trail, every shift in the canopy. The idea of relying on drones felt strange to them.” But over time, their perspective changed. “They don’t see it anymore as a replacement,” he says. “They see it as an extension of their knowledge.”

That shift took time. It took trust. And it was only possible because the project honored what communities already knew.

A similar experience unfolded in Vega del Sol, a small Chinantec community in southern Mexico. The local forest brigade, deeply rooted in traditional ecological knowledge, was initially unsure how mobile forest monitoring apps would align with their practices.

With support and participatory training, the brigade began documenting tree species, wildlife sightings and forest health indicators using digital tools. For Aidee, Milca and Angélica, three young Indigenous women from the community, these tools became a way to validate what they had already learned from growing up close to the land.

By working alongside seasoned brigade members, they bridged generational knowledge with innovation. Their leadership expanded community participation and strengthened conservation efforts. As Angélica explained: “Our ancestors taught us the importance of the forest. Now, we can use these new tools to share that knowledge with others and protect our land for future generations.”

What made this work wasn’t just the technology. It was the process. The tools were introduced slowly, respectfully, and always with the understanding that the community comes first.

Meanwhile, in Honduras, forest fires are a persistent threat. To support rapid response, we worked with local brigades and government teams to introduce satellite mapping and digital tools, not to replace traditional methods but to enhance them.

Víctor Daniel, a brigade leader, saw the change firsthand: “Before, we relied on what people saw and reported, but now with satellite data and digital mapping, we know exactly where to go and what resources we need.” Beyond quicker response times, the tools helped communities document their work and advocate for more institutional support. It was a clear example of technology amplifying, not overriding, local knowledge and initiative.

A shared path forward

If there’s one lesson from these stories, it’s this: technology should never be the starting point.

People come first: their knowledge, their relationships with the land, their leadership.

When introduced with care, technology can help communities act faster, plan better and advocate more effectively, but only when it reflects local realities, and only when it supports — not supplants — cultural wisdom.

Whether in the forests of Totonicapán, the hills of Oaxaca, or the fire-prone landscapes of Honduras, the lesson is the same: When people feel ownership of both their traditions and the tools that support them, conservation becomes more than a project. It becomes a shared responsibility.

Marco Acevedo is Mexico program officer for the EcoLogic Development Fund.

Related audio from Mongabay’s podcast: Indigenous communities’ traditional ecological knowledge is key to conservation ~ a conversation with National Geographic photographer Kiliii Yüyan, listen here:

See a related commentary:

An alternative approach to bridge Indigenous knowledge and Western science for conservation (commentary)

See more coverage of conservation technology:

Radio tags help reveal the secret lives of tiger salamanders